ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2023
Quantitatively relating magnetic resonance
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world evidence on gadoteridol safety: A 20-year FAERS database study revealing critical adverse reaction patterns.Medicine · 2026Article
- Skin Relevant Biomaterials from Wound Healing, Medical Aesthetics, Flexible Electronics to Artificial Intelligence and Beyond.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Injection site dictates the immune response to a biodegradable polymer and corresponding collagen regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A gradient core-shell microsphere to enable effective embolization of liver cancer via interventional therapy.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Long-acting management of diabetes and associated complications using an injectable thermosensitive hydrogel incorporating IgG-conjugated GLP-1RA.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Y-shaped DNA as a dynamic self-assembly nanomaterial for phenotype-specific regulation of stem cell differentiation on the gene level.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Biomaterials for neuroengineering: applications and challenges.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Article
- Biodegradable polymeric occluder with controllable locking structure for closure of atrial septal defect via interventional treatment.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Decellularization of fish tissues for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Effects of serum proteins on corrosion rates and product bioabsorbability of biodegradable metals.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Article
- Nanomaterials based on hollow gold nanospheres for cancer therapy.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising non-invasive method to assess cartilage regeneration based on the quantitative relationship between MRI features and concentrations of the major components in the extracellular matrix (ECM). To this end,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.