Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206127›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2023

Effect of fixational eye movements in corneal topography measurements with optical coherence tomography.

Alberto de Castro, Eduardo Martínez-Enríquez, Susana Marcos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In vivo assessment of multifocal contact lens fitting using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alberto de CastroInstituto de Óptica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-3412
Eduardo Martínez-EnríquezInstituto de Óptica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-8846
Susana MarcosInstituto de Óptica, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-1697
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Susana Marcos · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in applying optical coherence tomography (OCT) to quantify the topography of ocular structures. However, in its most usual configuration, OCT data is acquired sequentially while a beam is scanned through the region of interest, and the presence of fixational eye movements can affect the accuracy of the technique. Several scan patterns and motion correction algorithms have been proposed to minimize this effect, but there is no consensus on the ideal parameters to obtain a correct topography. We have acquired corneal OCT images with raster and radial patterns, and modeled the data acquisition in the presence of eye movements. The simulations replicate the experimental variability in shape (radius of curvature and Zernike polynomials), corneal power, astigmatism, and calculated wavefront aberrations. The variability of the Zernike modes is highly dependent on the scan pattern, with higher variability in the direction of the slow scan axis. The model can be a useful tool to design motion correction algorithms and to determine the variability with different scan patterns.

Identifiers

PMID37206127
PMCPMC10191639
OpenAlexW4361212773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.