Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206072›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2023

Surgical treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and challenges.

Di Wang, Min Xiao, Zhen-Miao Wan, Xin Lin, Qi-Yong Li, Shu-Sen Zheng

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Di WangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Min XiaoDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan 250000, Shandong Province, China.
Zhen-Miao WanDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xin LinDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan 250000, Shandong Province, China.
Qi-Yong LiDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan 250000, Shandong Province, China.
Shu-Sen ZhengDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory, Jinan 250000, Shandong Province, China.
Zhejiang Shuren University · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and was the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide in 2020. It includes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (representing 75%-85% of cases), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (representing 10%-15% of cases), and other rare types. The survival rate of patients with HCC has risen with improved surgical technology and perioperative management in recent years; however, high tumor recurrence rates continue to limit long-term survival, even after radical surgical resection (exceeding 50% recurrence). For resectable recurrent liver cancer, surgical removal [either salvage liver transplantation (SLT) or repeat hepatic resection] remains the most effective therapy that is potentially curative for recurrent HCC. Thus, here, we introduce surgical treatment for recurrent HCC. Areas Covered: A literature search was performed for recurrent HCC using Medline and PubMed up to August 2022. Expert commentary: In general, long-term survival after the re-resection of recurrent liver cancer is usually beneficial. SLT has equivalent outcomes to primary liver transplantation for unresectable recurrent illness in a selected group of patients; however, SLT is constrained by the supply of liver grafts. SLT seems to be inferior to repeat liver resection when considering operative and postoperative results but has the major advantage of disease-free survival. When considering the similar overall survival rate and the current situation of donor shortages, repeat liver resection remains an important option for recurrent HCC.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaPrimary liver cancerRepeated liver resectionSalvage liver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID37206072
PMCPMC10190723
OpenAlexW4366763757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.