Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206054›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Operating during pregnancy: A needs assessment among surgical residents in Austria.

Nadja Taumberger, Philipp Foessleitner, Petra Pateisky, Bettina Toth, Taja Bracic, Karin Windsperger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadja TaumbergerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Philipp FoessleitnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Petra PateiskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bettina TothMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria.
Taja BracicDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Karin WindspergerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Austria, female physicians must immediately disrupt their surgical training as soon as their pregnancy is announced. In Germany, surveys on the topic of "female surgeons performing surgery during pregnancy" led to a reform of the German Maternity Protection Act, which came into force on January 1, 2018, and allows female physicians to perform risk-adapted surgery during pregnancy at their own request. However, in Austria, such reform is still pending. The study aimed i) to assess the current situation of how pregnant female surgeons handle their training under the actual restrictive legislature in Austria, especially in context of operative activity, and ii) to identify needs for improvements. Therefore, a nation-wide online survey, initiated by the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Young Forum of the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, was performed from June 1 to December 24, 2021, among employed physicians working in surgical specialties. To conduct a general needs assessment, the questionnaire was made available to both female and male physicians in all positions. In total, 503 physicians participated in the survey, of which 70.4% (n = 354) were women and 29.6% (n = 149) were men. The majority of the women (61.3%) were undergoing residency training at the time of their pregnancy. The announcement of the pregnancy to the supervisor(s) occurred on average in the 13th week of gestation (week 2-40). Before that, pregnant female physicians spent an average of 10 h per trimester (first trimester: 0-120 h; second trimester: 0-100 h) in the operating room. The main reason for women to continue surgical activity despite their (yet unreported) pregnancy was "own request". 93% (n = 469) of the participants explicitly wished to be able to perform surgical activities in a safe setting during pregnancy. This response was independent of gender (p = 0.217), age (p = 0.083), specialty (p = 0.351), professional position (p = 0.619), and previous pregnancy (p = 0.142). In conclusion, there is an urgent need to offer female surgeons the possibility of continuing surgical activities during pregnancy. This handling would significantly increase the career opportunities for women who want to build up both a successful career and a family life.

Indexed as

Equal rightsFemale physiciansMaternity protection lawOperating during pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37206054
PMCPMC10189166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.