ArticleHeliyon2023
Operating during pregnancy: A needs assessment among surgical residents in Austria.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fertility, family planning, pregnancy and motherhood among women doctors working in the EU and UK: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Preferred Working Time Models and Equal Opportunities in Gynecology and Obstetrics: Results of the Systematic Trinational FARBEN Survey.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Austria, female physicians must immediately disrupt their surgical training as soon as their pregnancy is announced. In Germany, surveys on the topic of "female surgeons performing surgery during pregnancy" led to a reform of the German Maternity Protection Act, which came into force on January 1, 2018, and allows female physicians to perform risk-adapted surgery during pregnancy at their own request. However, in Austria, such reform is still pending. The study aimed i) to assess the current situation of how pregnant female surgeons handle their training under the actual restrictive legislature in Austria, especially in context of operative activity, and ii) to identify needs for improvements. Therefore, a nation-wide online survey, initiated by the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Young Forum of the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, was performed from June 1 to December 24, 2021, among employed physicians working in surgical specialties. To conduct a general needs assessment, the questionnaire was made available to both female and male physicians in all positions. In total, 503 physicians participated in the survey, of which 70.4% (n = 354) were women and 29.6% (n = 149) were men. The majority of the women (61.3%) were undergoing residency training at the time of their pregnancy. The announcement of the pregnancy to the supervisor(s) occurred on average in the 13th week of gestation (week 2-40). Before that, pregnant female physicians spent an average of 10 h per trimester (first trimester: 0-120 h; second trimester: 0-100 h) in the operating room. The main reason for women to continue surgical activity despite their (yet unreported) pregnancy was "own request". 93% (n = 469) of the participants explicitly wished to be able to perform surgical activities in a safe setting during pregnancy. This response was independent of gender (p = 0.217), age (p = 0.083), specialty (p = 0.351), professional position (p = 0.619), and previous pregnancy (p = 0.142). In conclusion, there is an urgent need to offer female surgeons the possibility of continuing surgical activities during pregnancy. This handling would significantly increase the career opportunities for women who want to build up both a successful career and a family life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.