ArticleHeliyon2023
Effects of incentive spirometry respiratory trainer device on lung recruitment in non-intubated mechanical ventilation moderate ARDS patients: A retrospective study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incentive Spirometer in COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Enhancing procedural quality and efficiency of methacholine bronchial challenge tests in patients with suspected cough-variant asthma: a quasi-experimental study utilizing nurse-patient communication and respiratory training.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: A retrospective study was performed to investigate the effects of incentive spirometry (IS)respiratory trainer device on lung recruitment in non-intubated moderate ARDS patients. Method: Moderate ARDS patients who non-intubated from January 2019 to October 2022 were enrolled to the lung recruitment group and the control group. Compared the PaO Results: The lung recruitment group 118 patients (73 males, 47.6 ± 16.5y) and the control group 103 patients (62 males, 50.2 ± 14.8y) were included. The P/F ratios, APACHE-II scores, LUS scores, and the maximum inspiratory volume (ml) were significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.000, P = 0.014, P = 0.013 and P = 0.001, respectively).The P/F ratios were higher (252.6 ± 55.6 v.s, 166.96.9re, Conclusions: Using IS to perform lung recruitment in moderate ARDS patients can improve maximum inspiratory volume, PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.