ArticleHeliyon2023
Clinical utility of resected pancreatic volume ratio calculation for predicting postoperative new-onset diabetes mellitus after distal pancreatectomy-a propensity-matched analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited literature is available on new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after distal pancreatectomy. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between surgery-related factors and the incidence of NODM after distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Patients were divided into the NODM-positive or NODM-negative group according to the diagnosis of NODM. After propensity score matching, the correlation between operation-related factors and the incidence of NODM was analyzed. The diagnostic threshold for predicting NODM was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Youden index. Results: No significant correlation was observed between the NODM incidence after distal pancreatectomy and operative blood loss, spleen preservation, surgical method (open or laparoscopy), postoperative ALB and HB (first day after surgery), and postoperative pathology. However, a significant correlation was found between the NODM incidence and the postoperative pancreatic volume or the resected pancreatic volume ratio. Resected pancreatic volume ratio was identified as a predictive risk factor for NODM. Youden index of the ROC curve was 0.548, with a cut off value of 32.05% for resected pancreatic volume ratio. The sensitivity and specificity of the cut off values were 0.952 and 0.595, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the volume ratio of pancreatic resection is a risk factor for the incidence of NODM after distal pancreatectomy. This can be used to predict the incidence of NODM and may have further clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.