Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37206001›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Histomorphometric evaluation of 3D printed graphene oxide-enriched poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Maha H Alazab, Salma A Abouelgeit, Moustafa N Aboushelib

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Graphene in 3D Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  5. Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Biomaterials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maha H AlazabMenoufia University Hospitals, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Salma A AbouelgeitDental Biomaterials Department, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Moustafa N AboushelibDental Biomaterials Department, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EGMenoufia University Hospitals · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Restoring large boney defects using bone grafts alone is an unpredictable procedure. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds suffer rapid biodegradation and lack sufficient osteo-conductivity. The aim of this study was to histomorphometrically evaluate three-dimensional printed graphene oxide-enriched poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds for bone regeneration in a rabbit defect model using two different concentrations of graphene oxide. Basic characteristic properties and mount of new bone regeneration formation were evaluated. Methods: two concentrations of graphene oxide (1 and 3 wt%) were added to PCL scaffolds using hot blind technique while pure PCL scaffolds served as a control. Laboratory characterization included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), x-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), contact angle, internal porosity, in addition to density measurements. All scaffolds were subjected to biodegradation evaluation and cell cytotoxicity test. In vivo bone regeneration was evaluated in the tibia defect of a rabbit model by measuring the amount of new bone formation (n = 15, ά = 0.05). Results: SEM images showed slight reduction in pore size and increase in filament width of scaffolds with increasing GO contents. However, the printed scaffolds matched well with the dimensions of the original design. XRD patterns revealed characteristic peaks identifying microstructure of scaffolds. Addition of GO increased crystallinity of the scaffolds. The contact angle and porosity readings indicated reduction in measurements with increased content of GO indicating improved wetting properties while the density followed an opposing pattern. Higher biodegradability values were associated with higher GO content resulting in acceleration of observed biodegradation. The results of cytotoxicity test showed reduction in cell viability with higher GO content. Bone regeneration was significantly enhanced for 1 wt% GO scaffolds compared to other groups as was evident by higher bone density observed in x-ray images and higher amount of new bone formation observed at different time intervals. Significance: Graphene oxide improved the physical and biological properties of PCL scaffolds and significantly enhanced new bone regeneration.

Indexed as

3D printingBone regenerationGraphene oxidePoly(ε-caprolacone)polymerPRPScaffolds

Identifiers

PMID37206001
PMCPMC10189497
OpenAlexW4368340712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.