ArticleJPGN reports2021
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Ferric Maltol in Children With Iron Deficiency: Phase 1 Study.
Article in JPGN reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ferric Maltol: Pediatric First Approval.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Iron Replacement Therapy with Oral Ferric Maltol: Review of the Evidence and Expert Opinion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Iron deficiency is common in children and can have negative effects on behavior and function. Standard oral ferrous iron replacement is poorly absorbed and can cause treatment-limiting gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs). Ferric maltol is formulated to improve gastrointestinal absorption and tolerability versus oral ferrous compounds. In adult phase 3 trials, it increased hemoglobin and iron stores versus placebo, with a gastrointestinal AE profile similar to placebo. Here, we assess different doses of ferric maltol in children with iron deficiency. Methods: This phase 1 trial involved children of age 10 to 17 years with ferritin <30 µg/L (or <50 µg/L with transferrin saturation [TSAT] <20%). Children were randomized 1:1:1 to oral ferric maltol 7.8 mg, 16.6 mg, or 30 mg twice daily for 9 days and once on day 10. The primary outcomes were iron uptake measures (serum iron and TSAT) and population pharmacokinetic analyses. Results: The trial included 37 children (mean age 14.0 years; baseline mean ± standard deviation ferritin 16.3 ± 8.02 µg/L). Ferric maltol increased iron uptake nondose-proportionally: serum iron and TSAT plateaued between the 2 higher doses on day 1 and were comparable across all doses on day 10. Twenty children (54%) experienced AEs (all mild/moderate, gastrointestinal 32%), with similar frequencies in each group. Conclusions: All 3 ferric maltol doses increased iron uptake in children with iron deficiency, even over the short study duration, and were well tolerated. Nondose-dependent changes in serum iron and TSAT indicate physiologic regulation of iron uptake to meet the body's needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.