ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Comparative evaluation of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of flowable, bulk-fill flowable, and nanohybrid composites in human gingival cells using cytome assay: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of flowable composite resins with different compositions: in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of natural silk fibers and synthetic fiber-reinforced composites on the cytotoxicity of fibroblast cell lines.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Biocompatibility is one of the major prerequisites for safe clinical application of materials. Resin composites release their components into oral environment following restoration which cause adverse reactions. Aims: To evaluate and compare the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of flowable, bulk-fill flowable, and nanohybrid composites with glass ionomer cement in human gingival cells using epithelial-based cytome assay. Methodology: Sixty healthy patients with noncarious cervical lesions were selected and randomly assigned to four groups ( Statistical Analysis Used: The results were subjected to statistical analysis using Friedman's test and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The highest level of cytotoxicity was noted at T2 time point with a significant decline at T3 time point. Least cytotoxic damage was exhibited by Group A followed by Group D. Highest cytotoxic effect was shown by Group B followed by Group C. There was no significant level of genotoxicity induced by any of the materials tested at different time points. Conclusion: There is significant cytotoxicity induced by the tested composite materials which had no long-term effects and no genotoxicity was induced by any of the restorative materials tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.