Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205888›Full record

ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD

Comparative evaluation of antifungal efficacy of conventional endodontic irrigants and chitosan nanoparticles.

Omkar Balsaraf, Srinidhi Surya Raghavendra, Dipali Shah, Mulay Sanjyot, Aishwarya Balsaraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CombatingJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026
    Article
  2. Evaluating the effectiveness of various disinfectants in deep carious lesions: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  3. Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Nanorevolution: Trends and future perspectives.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omkar BalsarafDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Srinidhi Surya RaghavendraDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Dipali ShahDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Mulay SanjyotDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Aishwarya BalsarafDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sinhgad Dental College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and chitosan nanoparticles against Materials and Methods: Strain of Results: Statistical analysis was performed using the test of one-way variance (ANOVA) and Conclusion: Chitosan nanoparticles and 2% CHX have similar efficacy against

Indexed as

Agar disc-diffusion testchitosan nanoparticleschlorhexidinesodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID37205888
PMCPMC10190093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.