ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Evaluation of volumetric substance loss and precision in targeted endodontic re-treatment with guided versus conventional access cavity preparations: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment: Relevant Aspects for Clinical Application-A Scoping Review.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance and volumetric dentin change after management of broken instrument using static navigation - AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Guided Endodontics for Non-surgical Root Canal Retreatment: A Systematic Review.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Review
- Comparison of tooth substance loss and angle deviation in access cavity preparation using guided endodontics and conventional method in calcified canals - An in vitro study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Root canal retreatment is typically viewed as an "all or nothing" approach. Whether there is periapical pathosis or not, it is advised that all restorative and obturation materials be removed from all roots. Selective root retreatment, a new therapeutic strategy, allows retreatment to be restricted to a single root or multiple roots exhibiting periapical pathosis. To address the issues, "guided endodontics," a unique guided technique for the preparation of apically extended access cavities, was introduced. Materials and Methods: In this Results: TER with conventional method showed significantly higher substance loss with Conclusion: In comparison to traditional TER, TER using a customized bur and three dimensions (3D)-guide results in much less substance loss. The dentinal loss was much lower in 3D-guided approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.