Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205789›Full record

ArticleCancer research2023

Intermetastatic and Intrametastatic Heterogeneity Shapes Adaptive Therapy Cycling Dynamics.

Jill Gallaher, Maximilian Strobl, Jeffrey West, Robert Gatenby, Jingsong Zhang, Mark Robertson-Tessi, Alexander R A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jill GallaherDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9831-6676
Maximilian StroblDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-4484-8823
Jeffrey WestDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9579-4664
Robert GatenbyDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-1621-1510
Jingsong ZhangDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-5116
Mark Robertson-TessiDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-0143-9587
Alexander R A AndersonDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-4383

Funding

Eco-Evolutionary dynamics of NSCLC to immunotherapy: Response and ResistanceU01CA232382 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDERSON, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON ALLAN, ANTONIA, SCOTT J. · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA232382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive therapies that alternate between drug applications and drug-free vacations can exploit competition between sensitive and resistant cells to maximize the time to progression. However, optimal dosing schedules depend on the properties of metastases, which are often not directly measurable in clinical practice. Here, we proposed a framework for estimating features of metastases through tumor response dynamics during the first adaptive therapy treatment cycle. Longitudinal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in 16 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing adaptive androgen deprivation treatment were analyzed to investigate relationships between cycle dynamics and clinical variables such as Gleason score, the change in the number of metastases over a cycle, and the total number of cycles over the course of treatment. The first cycle of adaptive therapy, which consists of a response period (applying therapy until 50% PSA reduction), and a regrowth period (removing treatment until reaching initial PSA levels), delineated several features of the computational metastatic system: larger metastases had longer cycles; a higher proportion of drug-resistant cells slowed the cycles; and a faster cell turnover rate sped up drug response time and slowed regrowth time. The number of metastases did not affect cycle times, as response dynamics were dominated by the largest tumors rather than the aggregate. In addition, systems with higher intermetastasis heterogeneity responded better to continuous therapy and correlated with dynamics from patients with high or low Gleason scores. Conversely, systems with higher intrametastasis heterogeneity responded better to adaptive therapy and correlated with dynamics from patients with intermediate Gleason scores. SIGNIFICANCE: Multiscale mathematical modeling combined with biomarker dynamics during adaptive therapy helps identify underlying features of metastatic cancer to inform treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrogen AntagonistsBiomarkersHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsBiomarkersProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37205789
PMCPMC10425736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.