Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205749›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Gaze following in Archosauria-Alligators and palaeognath birds suggest dinosaur origin of visual perspective taking.

Claudia Zeiträg, Stephan A Reber, Mathias Osvath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Layers of Social Meaning: Innate, Acquired, and Deliberative Levels of Referential Signal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cold-blooded culture? Assessing cultural behaviour in reptiles and its potential conservation implications.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Bottlenose dolphins (Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia ZeiträgDepartment of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6056-7437
Stephan A ReberDepartment of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8015-2538
Mathias OsvathDepartment of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-0930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking someone else's visual perspective marks an evolutionary shift in the formation of advanced social cognition. It enables using others' attention to discover otherwise hidden aspects of the surroundings and is foundational for human communication and understanding of others. Visual perspective taking has also been found in some other primates, a few songbirds, and some canids. However, despite its essential role for social cognition, visual perspective taking has only been fragmentedly studied in animals, leaving its evolution and origins uncharted. To begin to narrow this knowledge gap, we investigated extant archosaurs by comparing the neurocognitively least derived extant birds-palaeognaths-with the closest living relatives of birds, the crocodylians. In a gaze following paradigm, we showed that palaeognaths engage in visual perspective taking and grasp the referentiality of gazes, while crocodylians do not. This suggests that visual perspective taking originated in early birds or nonavian dinosaurs-likely earlier than in mammals.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesDinosaursAnimalsBiological EvolutionFossilsHumansMammalsPhylogenySpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID37205749
PMCPMC10198628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.