Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205453›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Auto-STEED: A data mining tool for automated extraction of experimental parameters and risk of bias items from

Wolfgang Emanuel Zurrer, Amelia Elaine Cannon, Ewoud Ewing, Marianna Rosso, Daniel S Reich, Benjamin V Ineichen

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wolfgang Emanuel Zurrer
Amelia Elaine Cannon
Ewoud Ewing
Marianna Rosso
Daniel S Reich
Benjamin V Ineichen
University of Zurich · CHKarolinska University Hospital · SENational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews, i.e., research summaries that address focused questions in a structured and reproducible manner, are a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine and research. However, certain systematic review steps such as data extraction are labour-intensive which hampers their applicability, not least with the rapidly expanding body of biomedical literature. Objective: To bridge this gap, we aimed at developing a data mining tool in the R programming environment to automate data extraction from neuroscience Results: Our data mining tool Auto-STEED (Automated and STructured Extraction of Experimental Data) was able to extract key experimental parameters such as animal models and species as well as risk of bias items such as randomization or blinding from Conclusions: Our developed text mining tool Auto-STEED is able to extract key experimental parameters and risk of bias items from the neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID37205453
PMCPMC10187249
OpenAlexW4322491368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.