Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205367›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

WIDESPREAD RECEPTIVE FIELD REMAPPING IN EARLY VISUAL CORTEX.

Sachira Denagamage, Mitchell P Morton, Nyomi V Hudson, Anirvan S Nandy

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sachira DenagamageDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510.
Mitchell P MortonDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510.
Nyomi V HudsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510.
Anirvan S NandyDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-5349

Funding

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program (INP)T32NS041228 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Charles A Greer, Marina R Picciotto · 2001 to 2026
$12.0M
Yale Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY026878 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI In-Jung Kim · 2016 to 2026
$7.1M
NEUROBIOLOGY OF CORTICAL SYSTEMST32NS007224 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARDIN, JESSICA A · 1985 to 2025
$4.6M
Neural Mechanisms of Visual CrowdingR01EY032555 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Anirvan S. Nandy · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026878NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032555NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007224NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our eyes are in constant motion, yet we perceive the visual world as stable. Predictive remapping of receptive fields is thought to be one of the critical mechanisms for enforcing perceptual stability during eye movements. While receptive field remapping has been identified in several cortical areas, the spatiotemporal dynamics of remapping, and its consequences on the tuning properties of neurons, remain poorly understood. Here, we tracked remapping receptive fields in hundreds of neurons from visual Area V2 while subjects performed a cued saccade task. We found that remapping was far more widespread in Area V2 than previously reported and can be found in neurons from all recorded cortical layers and cell types. Surprisingly, neurons undergoing remapping exhibit sensitivity to two punctate locations in visual space. Furthermore, we found that feature selectivity is not only maintained during remapping but transiently increases due to untuned suppression. Taken together, these results shed light on the spatiotemporal dynamics of remapping and its ubiquitous prevalence in the early visual cortex, and force us to revise current models of perceptual stability.

Identifiers

PMID37205367
PMCPMC10187178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.