Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205346›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Wrist-worn Step Detection Algorithm with Deployment in the UK Biobank.

Scott R Small, Shing Chan, Rosemary Walmsley, Lennart von Fritsch, Aidan Acquah, Gert Mertes, Benjamin G Feakins, Andrew Creagh, Adam Strange, Charles E Matthews and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott R SmallNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Shing ChanNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Rosemary WalmsleyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Lennart von FritschNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Aidan AcquahNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Gert MertesNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Benjamin G FeakinsNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Andrew CreaghNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Adam StrangeSwissRe Institute, UK.
Charles E MatthewsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
David A CliftonInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford.
Andrew J PriceNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Sara KhalidNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Derrick BennettNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
Aiden DohertyNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Step count is an intuitive measure of physical activity frequently quantified in a range of health-related studies; however, accurate quantification of step count can be difficult in the free-living environment, with step counting error routinely above 20% in both consumer and research-grade wrist-worn devices. This study aims to describe the development and validation of step count derived from a wrist-worn accelerometer and to assess its association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in a large prospective cohort study. Methods: We developed and externally validated a hybrid step detection model that involves self-supervised machine learning, trained on a new ground truth annotated, free-living step count dataset (OxWalk, n=39, aged 19-81) and tested against other open-source step counting algorithms. This model was applied to ascertain daily step counts from raw wrist-worn accelerometer data of 75,493 UK Biobank participants without a prior history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or cancer. Cox regression was used to obtain hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association of daily step count with fatal CVD and all-cause mortality after adjustment for potential confounders. Findings: The novel step algorithm demonstrated a mean absolute percent error of 12.5% in free-living validation, detecting 98.7% of true steps and substantially outperforming other recent wrist-worn, open-source algorithms. Our data are indicative of an inverse dose-response association, where, for example, taking 6,596 to 8,474 steps per day was associated with a 39% [24-52%] and 27% [16-36%] lower risk of fatal CVD and all-cause mortality, respectively, compared to those taking fewer steps each day. Interpretation: An accurate measure of step count was ascertained using a machine learning pipeline that demonstrates state-of-the-art accuracy in internal and external validation. The expected associations with CVD and all-cause mortality indicate excellent face validity. This algorithm can be used widely for other studies that have utilised wrist-worn accelerometers and an open-source pipeline is provided to facilitate implementation.

Identifiers

PMID37205346
PMCPMC10187326
OpenAlexW4321480397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.