Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205309›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2023

Role of artificial intelligence in oncologic emergencies: a narrative review.

Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Giuseppe Greco, Sara Rossi, Gayane Aghakhanyan, Salvatore Masala, Mariano Scaglione, Michele Tonerini, Emanuele Neri

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence-based application in multiple myeloma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore Claudio FanniDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-3320
Giuseppe GrecoDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Sara RossiDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Gayane AghakhanyanDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5152-497X
Salvatore MasalaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
Mariano ScaglioneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-8064
Michele ToneriniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Emanuele NeriDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7950-4559
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncologic emergencies are a wide spectrum of oncologic conditions caused directly by malignancies or their treatment. Oncologic emergencies may be classified according to the underlying physiopathology in metabolic, hematologic, and structural conditions. In the latter, radiologists have a pivotal role, through an accurate diagnosis useful to provide optimal patient care. Structural conditions may involve the central nervous system, thorax, or abdomen, and emergency radiologists have to know the characteristics imaging findings of each one of them. The number of oncologic emergencies is growing due to the increased incidence of malignancies in the general population and also to the improved survival of these patients thanks to the advances in cancer treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) could be a solution to assist emergency radiologists with this rapidly increasing workload. To our knowledge, AI applications in the setting of the oncologic emergency are mostly underexplored, probably due to the relatively low number of oncologic emergencies and the difficulty in training algorithms. However, cancer emergencies are defined by the cause and not by a specific pattern of radiological symptoms and signs. Therefore, it can be expected that AI algorithms developed for the detection of these emergencies in the non-oncological field can be transferred to the clinical setting of oncologic emergency. In this review, a craniocaudal approach was followed and central nervous system, thoracic, and abdominal oncologic emergencies have been addressed regarding the AI applications reported in literature. Among the central nervous system emergencies, AI applications have been reported for brain herniation and spinal cord compression. In the thoracic district the addressed emergencies were pulmonary embolism, cardiac tamponade and pneumothorax. Pneumothorax was the most frequently described application for AI, to improve sensibility and to reduce the time-to-diagnosis. Finally, regarding abdominal emergencies, AI applications for abdominal hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, and intestinal intussusception have been described.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningneural networksoncologic emergenciesoncologic imaging

Identifiers

PMID37205309
PMCPMC10185441
OpenAlexW4367317206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.