Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205225›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Neuroimaging findings in preclinical amyotrophic lateral sclerosis models-How well do they mimic the clinical phenotype? A systematic review.

Amelia Elaine Cannon, Wolfgang Emanuel Zürrer, Charlotte Zejlon, Zsolt Kulcsar, Sebastian Lewandowski, Fredrik Piehl, Tobias Granberg, Benjamin Victor Ineichen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amelia Elaine Cannon *Center for Reproducible Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Wolfgang Emanuel Zürrer *Center for Reproducible Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Charlotte ZejlonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Zsolt KulcsarDepartment of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sebastian LewandowskiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik PiehlDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias GranbergDepartment of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Benjamin Victor IneichenCenter for Reproducible Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Animal models for motor neuron diseases (MND) such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are commonly used in preclinical research. However, it is insufficiently understood how much findings from these model systems can be translated to humans. Thus, we aimed at systematically assessing the translational value of MND animal models to probe their external validity with regards to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Methods: In a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and Embase, we retrieved 201 unique publications of which 34 were deemed eligible for qualitative synthesis including risk of bias assessment. Results: ALS animal models can indeed present with human ALS neuroimaging features: Similar to the human paradigm, (regional) brain and spinal cord atrophy as well as signal changes in motor systems are commonly observed in ALS animal models. Blood-brain barrier breakdown seems to be more specific to ALS models, at least in the imaging domain. It is noteworthy that the G93A-SOD1 model, mimicking a rare clinical genotype, was the most frequently used ALS proxy. Conclusions: Our systematic review provides high-grade evidence that preclinical ALS models indeed show imaging features highly reminiscent of human ALS assigning them a high external validity in this domain. This opposes the high attrition of drugs during bench-to-bedside translation and thus raises concerns that phenotypic reproducibility does not necessarily render an animal model appropriate for drug development. These findings emphasize a careful application of these model systems for ALS therapy development thereby benefiting refinement of animal experiments. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022373146.

Indexed as

3Ramyotrophic lateral sclerosisexternal validitymagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)motor neuron disease (MND)neuroimagingneurosciencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37205225
PMCPMC10185801
OpenAlexW4367679018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.