Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37205030›Full record

ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2023

Legal Considerations in Emergency Psychiatry.

John S Rozel, Tara Toohey, Priyanka Amin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John S RozelDepartment of Psychiatry (Rozel, Amin) and School of Law (Rozel), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Rozel, Amin); Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii, Honolulu (Toohey).
Tara TooheyDepartment of Psychiatry (Rozel, Amin) and School of Law (Rozel), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Rozel, Amin); Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii, Honolulu (Toohey).
Priyanka AminDepartment of Psychiatry (Rozel, Amin) and School of Law (Rozel), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; UPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Rozel, Amin); Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii, Honolulu (Toohey).
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency psychiatry stands at the fulcrum between the general principles of autonomy and liberty balanced against illnesses that both subvert autonomy and amplify risks for violence and suicide. Although all specialties of medicine must operate in adherence with the law, emergency psychiatry is particularly constrained and guided by state and federal laws. Routine matters of emergency psychiatric care-including involuntary assessment, admission and treatment, management of agitation, medical stabilization and transfer, confidentiality, voluntary and involuntary commitment, and duties to third parties-all occur within carefully delimited legal boundaries, rules, and processes. This article provides a basic overview of critical legal principles relevant to the practice of emergency psychiatry.

Indexed as

Civil lawEmergency Psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID37205030
PMCPMC10172539
OpenAlexW4316464530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.