ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2023
Visualisation ergonomics and robotic surgery.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07618429 (Control Location Using Two Commands), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Control Location Using Two Commands: Hand Versus Foot, Workload and Accuracy Response Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Robotic Surgery Simulation
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Use of Augmented Reality for Navigation in Minimally Invasive Abdominal and Thoracic Soft-Tissue Surgery: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of 2D and 3D visualization in minimally invasive and robotic surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Redefining surgical ergonomics: a systematic review of ergonomic outcomes in robotic urological surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Visual, physical, and mental strain during simulated robotic surgical tasks on Hugo™ RAS and impact of microbreaks on them: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- 3D vs. 2D-4 K: Performance and self-perception of laparoscopic novices in a randomized prospective teaching intervention using standard tasks and box trainers.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Trial
- Perioperative management and challenges of robotic-assisted surgery: a narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Initial experience with the MIZZO ENDO 4000 robotic surgical system: a prospective, single-center, multi-specialty study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Transitioning From Laparoscopic to Robotic Bariatric Surgery: A Surgeon-Centered Analytic Approach.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- White paper: robotic cholecystectomy-new technology but safe principles still apply.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Environmental stewardship and robotic surgery: innovation without compromise.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Durability of reusable instruments and hidden costs in robotic-assisted surgery: a retrospective multidisciplinary analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Real-world performance of the SSI Mantra™ robotic system: a multi-centric multi-specialty study evaluating its safety and surgical applications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted video analysis for evaluating ergonomic strain in robotic surgeons: a pilot study from the SAGES ergonomics task force.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- The Pregnant Surgeon: Welcoming the Advanced Ergonomics of Robotic Surgery.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Review
- [Case of tooth autotransplantation with robotic surgery assistance].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Article
- SETY©: A next-generation robotic training platform for safe and autonomous surgery in space - surgical biomechatronics design and Hardware-Software integration within the SY-MIS project.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of visual ergonomics in microsurgery: a real-time video processing solution.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation using the KangDuo surgical Robot-01 system: a prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study.BMC surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereopsis may be an advantage of robotic surgery. Perceived robotic ergonomic advantages in visualisation include better exposure, three-dimensional vision, surgeon camera control, and line of sight screen location. Other ergonomic factors relating to visualisation include stereo-acuity, vergence-accommodation mismatch, visual-perception mismatch, visual-vestibular mismatch, visuospatial ability, visual fatigue, and visual feedback to compensate for lack of haptic feedback. Visual fatigue symptoms may be related to dry eye or accommodative/binocular vision stress. Digital eye strain can be measured by questionnaires and objective tests. Management options include treatment of dry eye, correction of refractive error, and management of accommodation and vergence anomalies. Experienced robotic surgeons can use visual cues like tissue deformation and surgical tool information as surrogates for haptic feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.