ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2023
The changing landscape of agriculture: role of precision breeding in developing smart crops.
Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mathematical modeling with RGB data for comparative analysis of rice lineages and distribution of breaking points.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Plant BTB (Broad-Complex, Tramtrack, and Bric-à-Brac) Proteins: Structural Features, Biological Functions, and Roles in Stress Responses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- DNA Methylation Dynamics in Plant Abiotic Stress Response: Mechanisms, Memory, and Breeding Applications.Genes · 2026Review
- Review
- Environment friendly pesticide formulation by adding certain adjuvants and their biological performance against Sitophilus oryzae (L.).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Revitalizing maize growth and yield in water-limited environments through silicon and zinc foliar applications.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat: enhancing quality and productivity for global food security-a review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Molecular and genetic insights into secondary metabolic regulation underlying insect-pest resistance in legumes.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food plants play a crucial role in human survival, providing them essential nutrients. However, traditional breeding methods have not been able to keep up with the demands of the growing population. The improvement of food plants aims to increase yield, quality, and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. With CRISPR/Cas9, researchers can identify and edit key genes conferring desirable qualities in agricultural plants, including increased yield, enhanced product quality attributes, and increased tolerance to biotic and abiotic challenges. These modifications have enabled the creation of "smart crops" that exhibit rapid climatic adaptation, resistance to extreme weather conditions and high yield and quality. The use of CRISPR/Cas9 combined with viral vectors or growth regulators has made it possible to produce more efficient modified plants with certain conventional breeding methods. However, ethical and regulatory aspects of this technology must be carefully considered. Proper regulation and application of genome editing technology can bring immense benefits to agriculture and food security. This article provides an overview of genetically modified genes and conventional as well as emerging tools, including CRISPR/Cas9, that have been utilized to enhance the quality of plants/fruits and their products. The review also discusses the challenges and prospects associated with these techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37204621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.