Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37204472›Full record

ReviewLasers in medical science2023

Laser ablation: a unique and beneficial therapeutic option for pilonidal sinus? And the potential for further innovation-a review.

Rohit Ganduboina, Arjun Sreekumar, Palak Dutta, Ananya Dhawan, Arshiya Adhnon, Atman Soni, Arya Sudarsan, Ahana Basu, Yashaank Kumar, Indraneil Mukherjee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Rohit GanduboinaNRI Institute of Medical Sciences, Visakhapatnam, India. rohitganduboyina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4876-9620
Arjun SreekumarK S Hegde Medical Academy, Mangaluru, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-741X
Palak DuttaKyiv Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2299-555X
Ananya DhawanSoochow University, Suzhou, China.
Arshiya AdhnonDubai Medical College for Girls, Dubai, UAE.
Atman SoniMedical College Baroda, Vadodara, India.
Arya SudarsanSir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College, Belle Rive, Vacoas-Phoenix, Mauritius.
Ahana BasuBharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, India.
Yashaank KumarSoochow University, Suzhou, China.
Indraneil MukherjeeStaten Island University Hospital-Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4661-2876
Soochow University · CNBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · INDubai Medical College · AEIndian Institute of Management Visakhapatnam · INK S Hegde Medical Academy · INKyiv Medical University · UANorthwell Health · USSir Sayajirao General Hospital Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser has revolutionized the medical field, broadening the diagnostic and therapeutic spectrum, with diode (630-980 nm) and Nd:YAG (1064 nm) lasers being the common choices in ablation procedures. Laser ablation in pilonidal sinus disease is a new minimally invasive technique with good treatment efficacy, low post-op morbidity, and shorter recovery periods following employment. This review study aimed to provide information on the use of lasers in pilonidal sinus disease and their effectiveness compared to other conventional methods. The articles considered were obtained by performing a literature search in PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, and 44 articles were included in this study. Techniques like sinus laser-assisted closure (SiLaC), sinus laser therapy (SiLaT), pilonidal sinus laser treatment (PiLaT), and laser-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (LEPSiT) were included and reviewed. Diode laser was most commonly used, with local anesthesia preferred over spinal or general anesthesia. The highest healing rate was observed with Nd:YAG laser and the SiLaT technique. Recurrence was low, particularly in patients who underwent multiple procedures. On reviewing the published literature, laser ablation procedures showed lower morbidity and post-op complications. Patient satisfaction was higher, and the overall cost was found to be lower with minimally invasive techniques. Long-term prospective studies comparing lasers with other surgical techniques would help us ascertain the future treatment modality of pilonidal sinus disease.

Indexed as

Laser TherapyPilonidal SinusSkin DiseasesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeLaser ablationMinimally invasive techniquePilonidal sinusReview

Identifiers

PMID37204472
OpenAlexW4377094154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.