ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023
What Can We Learn from Breast Implant Explantation: a 28-Year, Multicenter Retrospective Study of 1004 Explantation Cases.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07765953 (Thirteen-Year Trends in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation, Implant Replacement, and Explantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Thirteen-Year Trends in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation, Implant Replacement, and Explantation: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-Reported Symptom Changes Following Breast Implant Explantation with Total Capsulectomy: A Prospective Case Series of 50 Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond the Posts: Analyzing Breast Implant Illness Discourse With Natural Language Processing and Deep Learning.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025Article
- Use of the Thermal Camera to Assess the Perfusion of the Nipple-Areola Complex and Lower Adipoglandular Flap in Post-Explantation Mastopexy.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Biomimetic optimization of silicone breast implant integration: insights into wound healing and the foreign body response.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Drainless Implant Removal: A Technique to Minimize Breast Disfigurement After Explantation.Eplasty · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplant-based breast augmentation remains popular, but the controversy over the safety and longevity of implants has continued. An event-based analysis of reasons for implant explantation may provide us with some insight into the controversy.
methodsData from May 1994 to October 2022 of explantation cases from aesthetic breast augmentation in three medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, time to explantation, reasons for visit, the major reason for explantation and intraoperative findings were analyzed.
resultsA total of 522 patients with 1004 breasts were included in our study. Objective explantation reasons accounted for 34.0% in primary augmentation breasts and 47.6% in revision augmentation breasts, which were significantly different (p = 0.006). The most common complaint was dissatisfaction with breast appearance, followed by concerns about implant safety, poor hand feeling and pain. 43.5% of the implants worn for more than 10 years were removed for objective reasons, which was found significantly different with the proportion of objective reasons in implants removed within 1 year and 1-5 years postoperatively (p < 0.008).
conclusionThe proportion of different reasons for implant explantation varies across the times of surgeries and the years that the implant had been worn. As the years of implant wearing increase, the proportion of subjective reasons decreases in implant removal cases and objective reasons increase among them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.