Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37204467›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023

What Can We Learn from Breast Implant Explantation: a 28-Year, Multicenter Retrospective Study of 1004 Explantation Cases.

Ziying Zhang, Jun Qi, Xuefeng Zhang, Jian Wang, Zhengyao Li, Minqiang Xin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07765953 (Thirteen-Year Trends in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation, Implant Replacement, and Explantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07765953 completednot on this map

Thirteen-Year Trends in Primary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation, Implant Replacement, and Explantation: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorResearch IncRan2012 to 2024Enrolled22,642ConditionsAesthetic Breast Surgery, Breast ImplantsArmsPrimary Aesthetic Breast Augmentation, Breast Implant Replacement, Definitive Breast Implant Removal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ziying Zhang *Department of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China.
Jun Qi *Department of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China.
Xuefeng ZhangDepartment of Aesthetic Surgery, Bravou Plastic Surgery Hospital, No.21, Section 4, Renmin South Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610000, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Cosmetic Surgery, Dalian Metime Medical Cosmetic Hospital, No 427 Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, 116021, China.
Zhengyao LiDepartment of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China.
Minqiang XinDepartment of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi-Jing-Shan District, Beijing, 100144, China. doctorshin@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5272-6108
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPlastic Surgery Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplant-based breast augmentation remains popular, but the controversy over the safety and longevity of implants has continued. An event-based analysis of reasons for implant explantation may provide us with some insight into the controversy.

methodsData from May 1994 to October 2022 of explantation cases from aesthetic breast augmentation in three medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, time to explantation, reasons for visit, the major reason for explantation and intraoperative findings were analyzed.

resultsA total of 522 patients with 1004 breasts were included in our study. Objective explantation reasons accounted for 34.0% in primary augmentation breasts and 47.6% in revision augmentation breasts, which were significantly different (p = 0.006). The most common complaint was dissatisfaction with breast appearance, followed by concerns about implant safety, poor hand feeling and pain. 43.5% of the implants worn for more than 10 years were removed for objective reasons, which was found significantly different with the proportion of objective reasons in implants removed within 1 year and 1-5 years postoperatively (p < 0.008).

conclusionThe proportion of different reasons for implant explantation varies across the times of surgeries and the years that the implant had been worn. As the years of implant wearing increase, the proportion of subjective reasons decreases in implant removal cases and objective reasons increase among them. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsMammaplastyEstheticsFollow-Up StudiesHumansProsthesis FailureReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37204467
PMCPMC10196311
OpenAlexW4377093016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.