Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37204147›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2023

Promoting Equality in the Governance of Heritable Human Genome Editing through Ubuntu: Reflecting on a South African Public Engagement Study.

Bonginkosi Shozi, Donrich Thaldar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Social license -What's in a name?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bonginkosi ShoziUniversity of California, San Diego.ORCID 0000-0003-2994-0795
Donrich ThaldarUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal.ORCID 0000-0002-7346-3490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent public engagement study on heritable human genome editing (HHGE) conducted among South Africans, participants approved of using HHGE for serious health conditions-viewing it as a means of bringing about valuable social goods-and proposed that the government should actively invest resources to ensure everyone has equal access to the technology for these purposes. This position was animated by the view that

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenome, HumanHumansProspective StudiesSouth AfricaAfrican bioethicsAfrican philosophyequalityfuture generationsgenome editingpublic engagement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.