ArticleRenal failure2023
Machine learning algorithm to predict the in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Renal failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Fall Risk: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Prediction of Five-Year Mortality Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Models: A Retrospective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Renal impairment and in-hospital adverse renal events in critically ill patients assessed by age-adapted estimated glomerular filtration rate criteria.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis and chronic kidney disease.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Comparing Single-Hospital and National Models to Predict 30-Day Inpatient Mortality.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in the management of patients with renal dysfunction.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Development of a simplified model and nomogram for the prediction of pulmonary hemorrhage in respiratory distress syndrome in extremely preterm infants.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to establish and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
methodsThis study collected data on CKD patients from 2008 to 2019 using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV. Six ML approaches were used to build the model. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were used to choose the best model. In addition, the best model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.
resultsThere were 8527 CKD patients eligible for participation; the median age was 75.1 (interquartile range: 65.0-83.5) years, and 61.7% (5259/8527) were male. We developed six ML models with clinical variables as input factors. Among the six models developed, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model had the highest AUC, at 0.860. According to the SHAP values, the sequential organ failure assessment score, urine output, respiratory rate, and simplified acute physiology score II were the four most influential variables in the XGBoost model.
conclusionsIn conclusion, we successfully developed and validated ML models for predicting mortality in critically ill patients with CKD. Among all ML models, the XGBoost model is the most effective ML model that can help clinicians accurately manage and implement early interventions, which may reduce mortality in critically ill CKD patients with a high risk of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.