Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37203262›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2023

Impact of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on sugar producers in Ukraine.

Kate L Mandeville, Oleg Nivievskyi, Roman Neyter, Pavlo Martyshev, Volodymyr Vakhitov, Bethany Warren, Olena Doroshenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Kate L MandevilleHealth, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5525-1574
Oleg NivievskyiKyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Roman NeyterKyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Pavlo MartyshevKyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Volodymyr VakhitovKyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Bethany WarrenHealth, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Olena DoroshenkoHealth, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Kyiv School of Economics · UAWorld Bank · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages can promote health and raise revenue. Whether these taxes negatively impact domestic sugar producers, an argument often made by opponents, is understudied. We extended a simulation model based on a uniform specific volume-based tax of UAH 4/L in Ukraine. We estimated best- and worst-case scenarios for reductions in domestic sugar demand to be 162 and 23 000 metric tons. This is at worst ∼0.5% of current exports, meaning decreases in domestic demand could easily be absorbed by export markets given export trends. Due to highly protectionist sugar sector policy, sugar producers would not be able to fully substitute domestic sales revenues through increased export revenues, but the worst-case revenue gap was <0.5% of total sectoral output in recent years. Overall, introducing a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Ukraine is likely to have a very limited impact on domestic sugar producers.

Indexed as

Sugar-Sweetened BeveragesBeveragesCommerceHealth PromotionHumansSugarsTaxesUkraineSugars

Identifiers

PMID37203262
PMCPMC10393499
OpenAlexW4377092866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.