Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202933›Full record

SynthesisThe Indian journal of medical research

The prevalence of tuberculosis infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arohi Chauhan, Malik Parmar, Girish Chandra Dash, Hardik Solanki, Sandeep Chauhan, Jessica Sharma, Krushna Chandra Sahoo, Pranab Mahapatra, Raghuram Rao, Ravinder Kumar and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Indian journal of medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Primary tubercular chorioretinitis: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Arohi ChauhanPublic Health Foundation of India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Malik ParmarWHO Country Office for India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Girish Chandra DashIndian Council of Medical Research-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Hardik SolankiCentral TB Division, WHO NTEP Technical Support Network, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Sandeep ChauhanCentral TB Division, WHO NTEP Technical Support Network, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Jessica SharmaIndian Council of Medical Research-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Krushna Chandra SahooIndian Council of Medical Research-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pranab MahapatraDepartment of Psychiatry, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Raghuram RaoCentral TB Division, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Ravinder KumarCentral TB Division, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Kirankumar RadeWHO Country Office for India, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Sanghamitra PatiIndian Council of Medical Research-Regional Medical Research Centre, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: The National Prevalence Survey of India (2019-2021) estimated 31 per cent tuberculosis infection (TBI) burden among individuals above 15 years of age. However, so far little is known about the TBI burden among the different risk groups in India. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis, aimed to estimate the prevalence of TBI in India based on geographies, sociodemographic profile, and risk groups. Methods: To identify the prevalence of TBI in India, data sources such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for articles reporting data between 2013-2022, irrespective of the language and study setting. TBI data were extracted from 77 publications and pooled prevalence was estimated from the 15 community-based cohort studies. Articles were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and were sourced using a predefined search strategy from different databases. Results: Out of 10,521 records, 77 studies (46 cross-sectional and 31 cohort studies) were included. The pooled TBI prevalence for India based on the community-based cohort studies was estimated as 41 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.5-52.6%] irrespective of the risk of acquiring it, while the estimation was 36 per cent (95% CI 28-45%) prevalence observed among the general population excluding high-risk groups. Regions with high active TB burden were found to have a high TBI prevalence such as Delhi and Tamil Nadu. An increasing trend of TBI was observed with increasing age in India. Interpretation & conclusions: This review demonstrated a high prevalence of TBI in India. The burden of TBI was commensurate with active TB prevalence suggesting possible conversion of TBI to active TB. A high burden was recorded among people residing in the northern and southern regions of the country. Such local epidemiologic variation need to be considered to reprioritize and implement-tailored strategies for managing TBI in India.

Indexed as

Latent TuberculosisTuberculosisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaPrevalenceEpidemiologyprevalencesystematic reviewtuberculosis infection

Identifiers

PMID37202933
PMCPMC10319385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.