Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202865›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of haematology2023

Impact of thromboprophylaxis on hospital acquired thrombosis following discharge in patients admitted with COVID-19: Multicentre observational study in the UK.

Deepa J Arachchillage, Indika Rajakaruna, Zain Odho, Mike Makris, Mike Laffan, CA-COVID19 Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deepa J ArachchillageCentre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5993-4850
Indika RajakarunaDepartment of Computer Science, University of East London, University Way, London, UK.
Zain OdhoDepartment of Biochemistry, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5176-4364
Mike MakrisDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mike LaffanCentre for Haematology, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-3268
CA-COVID19 Investigators
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V037633/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-discharge thromboprophylaxis in patients admitted with COVID-19 remains controversial. We aimed to determine the impact of thromboprophylaxis on hospital acquired thrombosis (HAT) in patients (≥18 years) discharged following admission for COVID-19 in an observational study across 26 NHS Trusts in the UK (01.04.2020-31.12.2021). Overall, 8895 patients were included to the study: 971 patients were discharged with thromboprophylaxis and propensity score matched (PSM) with a desired ratio of 1:1, from patients discharged without thromboprophylaxis. Patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia, major bleeding during admission and pregnant women were excluded. As expected from 1:1 PSM, no difference was observed in parameters between the two groups, including duration of hospital stay, except the thromboprophylaxis group had a significantly higher proportion who had received therapeutic dose anticoagulation during admission. There were no differences in the laboratory parameters especially D-dimers between the two groups at admission or discharge. Median duration of thromboprophylaxis following discharge from hospital was 4 weeks (1-8 weeks). No difference was found in HAT in patients discharged with TP versus no TP (1.3% vs. 0.92%, p = 0.52). Increasing age and smoking significantly increased the risk of HAT. Many patients in both cohorts had raised D-dimer at discharge but D-dimer was not associated with increased risk of HAT.

Indexed as

COVID-19ThrombosisVenous ThromboembolismAftercareAnticoagulantsFemaleHospitalsHumansPatient DischargeUnited KingdomAnticoagulantsanticoagulantsCOVID-19D-dimerhospital acquired thrombosispropensity matchingThromboprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37202865
PMCPMC10952807
OpenAlexW4377093621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.