SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Comparison of clinical efficacy and surgical safety among three bone graft modalities in spinal tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterogeneity in longitudinal medication adherence patterns among patients with spinal tuberculosis: a latent class analysis using multi-timepoint follow-up data and associations with clinical outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Clinical and hematological factors associated with neurological involvement in spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Progress in diagnosis and treatment of primary spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- [Short-term effectiveness of anterior and middle columns repair and reconstruction with whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone through posterior approach in thoracolumbar tuberculosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Correction: Comparison of clinical efficacy and surgical safety among three bone graft modalities in spinal tuberculosis: a network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Prognostic values of geriatric nutrition risk index on elderly patients after spinal tuberculosis surgery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutogenous granular bone graft (AG), autogenous massive bone graft (AM), and titanium mesh bone graft (TM) are the three commonly utilized bone implant methods for spinal tuberculosis. However, the gold standard is still controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and surgical safety of three primary bone graft modalities.
methodsFor systematic literature review, several databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched up to December 2022. Stata (version 14.0) was employed for data analysis.
resultsOur network meta-analysis included 517 patients from 7 articles whose qualities are acceptable based on our quality assessment criteria. In direct comparison, AG was associated with a shorter operation time (MD = 73.51; CI 30.65-116.37) and a lesser blood loss (MD = 214.30; CI 7.17-421.44) than AM. TM had fewer loss of Cobb angle than AG (MD = 1.45; CI 0.13-2.76) and AM (MD = 1.21; CI 0.42-1.99). Compared with AG, TM (MD = 0.96; CI 0.06-1.87) was related to a shorter bone graft fusion time. In indirect comparison, for the clinical parameters, the rank of CRP (from best to worst) was as follows: TM (58%) > AM (27%) > AG (15%), the rank of ESR (from best to worst) was as follows: AG (61%) > AM (21%) > TM (18%), and the rank of VAS (from best to worst) was as follows: AG (65%) > TM (33%) > AM (2%). In the aspect of surgical data, what is noteworthy is that AG showed less blood loss [AG (93%) > TM (6%) > AM (1%)], operative time [AG (97%) > TM (3%) > AM (0)], and complications [AG (75%) > TM (21%) > AM (4%)] than AM and TM. As for imaging parameters, the rank of the loss of Cobb angle (from best to worst) was as follows: TM (99%) > AM (1%) > AG (0). Moreover, TM showed a shorter bone graft fusion time than AM and AG: TM (96%) > AM (3%) > AG (1%).
conclusionsThe results indicated that AG might be the optional treatment for spinal tuberculosis owing to the outcomes of surgical safety. Moreover, TM is another right choice which can significantly reduce the loss of Cobb angle and shorten bone graft fusion time with long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.