Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202779›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Prevalence of mutations in the cysteine desulfurase IscS (Pfnfs1) gene in recurrent Plasmodium falciparum infections following artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) treatment in Matayos, Western Kenya.

Beatrice Gachie, Kelvin Thiong'o, Brenda Muriithi, Jean Chepngetich, Noah Onchieku, Jeremiah Gathirwa, Peter Mwitari, Gabriel Magoma, Daniel Kiboi, Francis Kimani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beatrice GachieDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya. beatricegachie@yahoo.com.
Kelvin Thiong'oCentre for Biotechnology Research and Development (CBRD), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Off Raila Odinga Way, P.O. Box 54840-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brenda MuriithiCentre for Traditional Medicine and Drug Research (CTMDR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Off Raila Odinga Way, P.O. Box 54840-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jean ChepngetichDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Noah OnchiekuCentre for Biotechnology Research and Development (CBRD), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Off Raila Odinga Way, P.O. Box 54840-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jeremiah GathirwaCentre for Traditional Medicine and Drug Research (CTMDR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Off Raila Odinga Way, P.O. Box 54840-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Peter MwitariCentre for Traditional Medicine and Drug Research (CTMDR), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Off Raila Odinga Way, P.O. Box 54840-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gabriel MagomaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Pan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel KiboiDepartment of Biochemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), P.O. Box 62000 -00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Francis KimaniCentre for Biotechnology Research and Development (CBRD), Kenya Medical Research Institute, Off Raila Odinga Way, P.O. Box 54840-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEAfrican Centre for Technology Studies · KEJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KEPan African University Institute for Basic Sciences, Technology and Innovation

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a public health concern globally. Resistance to anti-malarial drugs has consistently threatened the gains in controlling the malaria parasites. Currently, artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) are the treatment regimens against Plasmodium falciparum infections in many African countries, including Kenya. Recurrent infections have been reported in patients treated with AL or DP, suggesting the possibility of reinfection or parasite recrudescence associated with the development of resistance against the two therapies. The Plasmodium falciparum cysteine desulfurase IscS (Pfnfs1) K65 selection marker has previously been associated with decreased lumefantrine susceptibility. This study evaluated the frequency of the Pfnfs1 K65 resistance marker and associated K65Q resistant allele in recurrent infections collected from P. falciparum-infected individuals living in Matayos, Busia County, in western Kenya.

methodsArchived dried blood spots (DBS) of patients with recurrent malaria infection on clinical follow-up days after treatment with either AL or DP were used in the study. After extraction of genomic DNA, PCR amplification and sequencing analysis were employed to determine the frequencies of the Pfnfs1 K65 resistance marker and K65Q mutant allele in the recurrent infections. Plasmodium falciparum msp1 and P. falciparum msp2 genetic markers were used to distinguish recrudescent infections from new infections.

resultsThe K65 wild-type allele was detected at a frequency of 41% while the K65Q mutant allele was detected at a frequency of 22% in the recurrent samples. 58% of the samples containing the K65 wild-type allele were AL treated samples and while 42% were DP treated samples. 79% of the samples with the K65Q mutation were AL treated samples and 21% were DP treated samples. The K65 wild-type allele was detected in three recrudescent infections (100%) identified from the AL treated samples. The K65 wild-type allele was detected in two recrudescent DP treated samples (67%) while the K65Q mutant allele was identified in one DP treated (33%) recrudescent sample.

conclusionsThe data demonstrate a higher frequency of the K65 resistance marker in patients with recurrent infection during the study period. The study underscores the need for consistent monitoring of molecular markers of resistance in regions of high malaria transmission.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaMalaria, FalciparumQuinolinesArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsCarbon-Sulfur LyasesDrug CombinationsHumansKenyaLumefantrineMutationPiperazinesPlasmodium falciparumPrevalenceAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsartenimolCarbon-Sulfur Lyasescysteine desulfuraseDrug CombinationsLumefantrinepiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolinesArtemether-lumefantrineCysteine desulfuraseDihydroartemisinin-piperaquinePlasmodium falciparumRecurrent infections

Identifiers

PMID37202779
PMCPMC10197370
OpenAlexW4377092792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.