Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202768›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2023

The effect of virtual reality on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor outcomes in nursing staffs: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Defi Efendi, Renny Wulan Apriliyasari, Juliana Gracia Eka Prihartami Massie, Cho Lee Wong, Regina Natalia, Bejo Utomo, Chiyar Edison Sunarya, Efa Apriyanti, Kee-Hsin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Defi EfendiSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, 11031, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Renny Wulan ApriliyasariInstitut Teknologi Kesehatan Cendekia Utama Kudus, Jl. Lingkar Timur No.Km.5, Jepang, Kec. Mejobo, Kabupaten Kudus, Central Java, Indonesia.
Juliana Gracia Eka Prihartami MassieNursing Department, Universitas Indonesia Hospital, Jl. Prof. Bahder Djohan, UI Campus, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Cho Lee WongThe Nethersole School of Nursing - The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Regina NataliaSchool of Nursing, Mitra Bunda Health Institute, Jl. Raya Seraya Nomor No.1, Tlk. Tering, Kec. Batam Kota, Batam, Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia.
Bejo UtomoNursing Department, Universitas Indonesia Hospital, Jl. Prof. Bahder Djohan, UI Campus, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Chiyar Edison SunaryaFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia & Nursing Department - Universitas Indonesia Hospital, Jl. Prof. Bahder Djohan, UI Campus, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Efa ApriyantiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia & Nursing Department - Universitas Indonesia Hospital, Jl. Prof. Bahder Djohan, UI Campus, Depok, West Java, Indonesia.
Kee-Hsin ChenPost-Baccalaureate Program in Nursing, College of Nursing, & Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, No. 250 Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, 11031, Taipei City, Taiwan. keehsin@tmu.edu.tw.

Funding

Directorate of Research and Development, Universitas Indonesia under Hibah PUTI 2022 NKB-743/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the healthcare systems of the world, reinforcing the competence and professionalism of nurses has become a concern. Gaining clinical nursing competence in the healthcare system requires more effort, and additional training is required. Medical education and training have begun using digital technologies, such as virtual reality (VR). The purpose of this research was to examine the efficacy of VR in terms of cognitive, emotional, and psychomotor outcomes and learning satisfaction in nurses.

methodThe study searched eight databases (Cochrane library, EBSCOHost, Embase, OVID MEDLINE, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for articles that met these criteria: (i) nursing staff, (ii) any virtual reality technology intervention for education, all levels of immersion, [1] randomized control trial and quasi-experiment study, and (iv) published articles and unpublished theses. The standardized mean difference was measured. The random effect model was applied to measure the main outcome of the study with a significance level of p < .05. The I

resultsA total of 6740 studies were identified, of which 12 studies with 1470 participants met the criteria for inclusion. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in the cognitive aspect (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.48; 95% CI = 0.33-2.63; p = .011, I

conclusionsVR may favorable as alternative method to increase nurse competencies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on larger samples are needed to strengthen the evidence for the effect of VR in various clinical nurse settings. ROSPERO registration number: CRD42022301260.

Indexed as

AffectiveCognitiveLearning satisfactionNursing staffPsychomotorVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37202768
PMCPMC10197414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.