Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202734›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Impact of tiered measures on social contact and mixing patterns of in Italy during the second wave of COVID-19.

Michele Tizzani, Alessandro De Gaetano, Christopher I Jarvis, Amy Gimma, Kerry Wong, W John Edmunds, Philippe Beutels, Niel Hens, Pietro Coletti, Daniela Paolotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michele TizzaniISI Foundation, Turin, Italy. mt.tizzani@isi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3068-5111
Alessandro De GaetanoISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.
Christopher I JarvisLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Amy GimmaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kerry WongLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
W John EdmundsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Philippe BeutelsCentre for Health Economic Research and Modeling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Niel HensCentre for Health Economic Research and Modeling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Pietro ColettiUHasselt, Data Science Institute and I-BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium.
Daniela PaolottiISI Foundation, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost countries around the world enforced non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19. Italy was one of the first countries to be affected by the pandemic, imposing a hard lockdown, in the first epidemic wave. During the second wave, the country implemented progressively restrictive tiers at the regional level according to weekly epidemiological risk assessments. This paper quantifies the impact of these restrictions on contacts and on the reproduction number.

methodsRepresentative (with respect to age, sex, and region of residence) longitudinal surveys of the Italian population were undertaken during the second epidemic wave. Epidemiologically relevant contact patterns were measured and compared with pre-pandemic levels and according to the level of interventions experienced by the participants. Contact matrices were used to quantify the reduction in the number of contacts by age group and contact setting. The reproduction number was estimated to evaluate the impact of restrictions on the spread of COVID-19.

resultsThe comparison with the pre-pandemic baseline shows a significant decrease in the number of contacts, independently from the age group or contact settings. This decrease in the number of contacts significantly depends on the strictness of the non-pharmaceutical interventions. For all levels of strictness considered, the reduction in social mixing results in a reproduction number smaller than one. In particular, the impact of the restriction on the number of contacts decreases with the severity of the interventions.

conclusionsThe progressive restriction tiers implemented in Italy reduced the reproduction number, with stricter interventions associated with higher reductions. Readily collected contact data can inform the implementation of mitigation measures at the national level in epidemic emergencies to come.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansItalyPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Contact matrixContact surveyCOVID-19Governmental responseItalyNon-pharmaceutical interventionsNPIReproduction numberSocial contact patterns

Identifiers

PMID37202734
PMCPMC10195658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.