ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Biomedical Engineering: ChatGPT's Controversial Impact on Research and Collaboration Paradigms.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the potential of large language model-based chatbots in challenges of ribosome profiling data analysis: a review.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) permeates various fields, ChatGPT emerges as a contentious force in biomedical engineering, stirring both excitement and concern. This letter explores the disruptive potential and controversial implications of ChatGPT on research, collaboration, and the future of the field. By presenting thought-provoking questions and confronting divisive issues, we aim to spark a lively debate on the responsible integration of AI technology in biomedical engineering while safeguarding the essence of human expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37202644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.