Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202642›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Predictive role of radiomics features extracted from preoperative cross-sectional imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in detecting lymph node metastasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Seyedeh Panid Madani, Haneyeh Shahbazian, Golnoosh Ansari, Alireza Mohseni, Ali Borhani, Shadi Afyouni, Ihab R Kamel

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-AttariRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Seyedeh Panid MadaniRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Haneyeh ShahbazianRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Golnoosh AnsariRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Alireza MohseniRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Ali BorhaniRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Shadi AfyouniRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Ihab R KamelRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, MRI 143, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. ikamel@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7927-6912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node metastases are associated with poor clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In preoperative imaging, conventional diagnostic modalities do not provide the desired accuracy in diagnosing lymph node metastasis. The current review aims to determine the pooled diagnostic profile of studies examining the role of radiomics features in detecting lymph node metastasis in PDAC. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles. The quality of the studies was examined using the Radiomics Quality Score and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools. Pooled results for sensitivity, specificity, likelihood, and odds ratios with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model (DerSimonian-Liard method). No significant publication bias was detected among the studies included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the validation datasets included in the study was 77.4% (72.7%, 81.5%) and pooled specificity was 72.4% (63.8, 79.6%). The diagnostic odds ratio of the validation datasets was 9.6 (6.0, 15.2). No statistically significant heterogeneity was detected for sensitivity and odds ratio (P values of 0.3 and 0.08, respectively). However, there was significant heterogeneity concerning specificity (P = 0.003). The pretest probability of having lymph node metastasis in the pooled databases was 52% and a positive post-test probability was 76% after the radiomics features were used, showing a net benefit of 24%. Classifiers trained on radiomics features extracted from preoperative images can improve the sensitivity and specificity of conventional cross-sectional imaging in detecting lymph node metastasis in PDAC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceMRIPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaRadiomicsTexture analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.