Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202606›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2023

What matters most to pediatric rheumatologists in deciding whether to discontinue biologics in a child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A best-worst scaling survey.

Gillian R Currie, Catherina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Marinka Twilt, Michelle M A Kip, Maarten J IJzerman, Susanne M Benseler, Joost F Swart, Sebastiaan J Vastert, Nico M Wulffraat, Rae Yeung and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gillian R CurrieDepartment of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. currie@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-9893
Catherina G M Groothuis-OudshoornDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Marinka TwiltSection of Rheumatology, Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michelle M A KipDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Maarten J IJzermanDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Susanne M BenselerSection of Rheumatology, Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Joost F SwartDepartment of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sebastiaan J VastertDepartment of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nico M WulffraatDepartment of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rae YeungDepartments of Paediatrics, Immunology and Medical Science, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Deborah A MarshallDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Twente · NLUtrecht University · NLUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Arthritis Society of Canada GC-18-001Canadian Institutes for Heath Research 381280Genome Canada OGI-150Reumafonds 848006001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCare for JIA patients has been transformed in the biologics era; however, biologics carry important (although rare) risks and are costly. Flares after biological withdrawal are seen frequently, yet there is little clinical guidance to identify which patients in clinical remission can safely have their biologic discontinued (by stopping or tapering). We examined what characteristics of the child or their context are important to pediatric rheumatologists when making the decision to discuss withdrawal of biologics.

methodsWe conducted a survey including a best-worst scaling (BWS) exercise in pediatric rheumatologists who are part of the UCAN CAN-DU network to assess the relative importance of 14 previously identified characteristics. A balanced incomplete block design was used to generate choice tasks. Respondents evaluated 14 choice sets of 5 characteristics of a child with JIA and identified for each set which was the most and least important in the decision to offer withdrawal. Results were analyzed using conditional logit regression.

resultsFifty-one (out of 79) pediatric rheumatologists participated (response rate 65%). The three most important characteristics were how challenging it was to achieve remission, history of established joint damage, and time spent in remission. The three least important characteristics were history of temporomandibular joint involvement, accessibility of biologics, and the patient's age.

conclusionsThese findings give quantitative insight about factors important to pediatric rheumatologists' decision-making about biologic withdrawal. In addition to high quality clinical evidence, further research is needed to understand the perspective of patients and families to inform shared decision-making about biologic withdrawal for JIA patients with clinically inactive disease. Key Points ● What is already known on this topic-there is limited clinical guidance for pediatric rheumatologists in making decisions about biologic withdrawal for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who are in clinical remission. ● What this study adds-this study quantitatively examined what characteristic of the child in clinical remission, or of their context, are most important to pediatric rheumatologists in deciding whether to offer withdrawal of biologics. ● How this study might affect research, practice or policy-understanding of these characteristics can provide useful information to other pediatric rheumatologists in making their decisions, and may guide areas to focus on for future research.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileBiological ProductsChildHumansRheumatologistsSurveys and QuestionnairesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsArthritis, JuvenileBiological therapyEconomics

Identifiers

PMID37202606
OpenAlexW4377093678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.