Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202599›Full record

Trial reportUpdates in surgery2023

Prognostic impact of tumor size on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a large SEER-based retrospective cohort study.

Qi Zhang, Baosong Li, Shiyao Zhang, Qianpeng Huang, Maorun Zhang, Gang Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi Zhang *Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Baosong Li *Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Shiyao ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Qianpeng HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Maorun ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China. lg1059@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-0850
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNBinzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the poor prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this research aimed to investigate the correlation between tumor size and prognosis, and develop a novel prediction model to guide individualized treatment. Patients pathologically diagnosed with mCRC were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015, and were randomly divided (7:3 ratio) into a training cohort (n = 5597) and a validation cohort (n = 2398). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze the relationship between tumor size and overall survival (OS). Univariate Cox analysis was applied to assess the factors associated with the prognosis of mCRC patients in the training cohort, and then multivariate Cox analysis was used to construct a nomogram model. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model. Patients with larger tumors had a worse prognosis. While brain metastases were associated with larger tumors compared to liver or lung metastases, bone metastases tended to be associated with smaller tumors. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that tumor size was an independent prognostic risk factor (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.19-1.38), in addition to the other ten variables (age, race, primary site, grade, histology, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, CEA level and metastases site). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS nomogram model yielded AUC values of more than 0.70 in both the training and validation cohorts, and its predictive performance was superior to that of the traditional TNM stage. Calibration plots demonstrated a good agreement between the predicted and observed 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS outcomes in both cohorts. The size of primary tumor was found to be significantly associated with prognosis of mCRC, and was also correlated with specific metastatic organ. In this study, we presented the first effort to create and validate a novel nomogram for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS probabilities of mCRC. The prognostic nomogram was demonstrated to have an excellent predictive ability in estimating individualized OS of patients with mCRC.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesMetastatic colorectal cancerPrognostic modelSEERTumor size

Identifiers

PMID37202599
PMCPMC10359205
OpenAlexW4377047002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.