Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202502›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2023

Convergence of dominance and neglect in flying insect diversity.

Amrita Srivathsan, Yuchen Ang, John M Heraty, Wei Song Hwang, Wan F A Jusoh, Sujatha Narayanan Kutty, Jayanthi Puniamoorthy, Darren Yeo, Tomas Roslin, Rudolf Meier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. UITOTO: a software for generating molecular diagnoses for species descriptions.Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Accuracy of occurrence and abundance estimates from insect metabarcoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of land cover and protected areas on flying insect diversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amrita SrivathsanCenter for Integrative Biodiversity Discovery, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7988-3437
Yuchen AngLee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
John M HeratyDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
Wei Song HwangLee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-2142
Wan F A JusohLee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-8429
Sujatha Narayanan KuttyDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jayanthi PuniamoorthyDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4534-9997
Darren YeoDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tomas RoslinDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-4791
Rudolf MeierCenter for Integrative Biodiversity Discovery, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany. Rudolf.Meier@mfn.berlin.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-2885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of arthropod biodiversity is unknown to science. Consequently, it has been unclear whether insect communities around the world are dominated by the same or different taxa. This question can be answered through standardized sampling of biodiversity followed by estimation of species diversity and community composition with DNA barcodes. Here this approach is applied to flying insects sampled by 39 Malaise traps placed in five biogeographic regions, eight countries and numerous habitats (>225,000 specimens belonging to >25,000 species in 458 families). We find that 20 insect families (10 belonging to Diptera) account for >50% of local species diversity regardless of clade age, continent, climatic region and habitat type. Consistent differences in family-level dominance explain two-thirds of variation in community composition despite massive levels of species turnover, with most species (>97%) in the top 20 families encountered at a single site only. Alarmingly, the same families that dominate insect diversity are 'dark taxa' in that they suffer from extreme taxonomic neglect, with little signs of increasing activities in recent years. Taxonomic neglect tends to increase with diversity and decrease with body size. Identifying and tackling the diversity of 'dark taxa' with scalable techniques emerge as urgent priorities in biodiversity science.

Indexed as

DipteraInsectaAnimalsBiodiversityBody SizeEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID37202502
PMCPMC10333119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.