Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202455›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Phytochemical screening and allelopathic potential of phytoextracts of three invasive grass species.

Shaista Jabeen, Muhammad Fraz Ali, Atta Mohi Ud Din, Talha Javed, Nouriya Salah Mohammed, Sunbal Khalil Chaudhari, Muhammad Ammar Javed, Baber Ali, Lixin Zhang, Mehdi Rahimi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Food science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Utilisation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Exploring the neuropharmacological properties of scopoletin-richAmerican journal of translational research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Shaista Jabeen *College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Muhammad Fraz Ali *College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Atta Mohi Ud DinNational Research Center of Intercropping, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Talha JavedCollege of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Nouriya Salah MohammedBotany Department, Faculty of Science, Sebha University, Sebha, Libya.
Sunbal Khalil ChaudhariInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus, Sargodha, 42100, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ammar JavedInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Baber AliDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Lixin ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China. zhanglixin@nwafu.edu.cn.
Mehdi RahimiDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan. mehdi83ra@yahoo.com.
Northwest A&F University · CNQuaid-i-Azam University · PKFujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNGovernment College University, Lahore · PKIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKSebha University · LYUniversity of Lahore · PKUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undoubtedly, it is important to remain vigilant and manage invasive grasses to prevent their spread and mitigate their negative impact on the environment. However, these aggressive plants can also play a beneficial role in certain contexts. For example, several invasive grasses provide valuable forage for livestock and have disease control potential. Therefore, a research experiment was conducted to explore the pros and cons of this approach, not only for surrounding vegetation but also for human and animal disease control. The study is primarily focused on developing livestock feed, plant-derived herbicides, and an understanding of the phytotoxic effects of invasive species. All plant parts of Cenchrus ciliaris L., Polypogon monspeliansis L., and Dicanthium annulatum (Forssk.) Stapf, were tested for their phyto-chemical screening, proximate, and toxicity analysis which was caused by the methanolic extract of these grass species. Qualitative phytochemical screening tests were performed for proximate composition analysis and toxicity assessment essays. The phytochemical analysis revealed the positive results for alkaloids, flavonoids, coumarins, phenols, saponins, and glycosides, while negative for tannins. Comparison of proximate analysis intimated maximum moisture (10.8%) and crude fat (4.1%) in P. monspeliensis, whereas maximum dry matter (84.1%), crude protein (13.95%), crude fiber (11%), and ash (7.2%) in D. annulatum. Five (10, 100, 500, 100, 10,000 ppm) and three (10, 1000, 10,000 ppm) different concentrations of methanolic extract prepared from C. ciliaris, P. monspeliansis, and D. annulatum were used respectively for root inhibition and seed germination essay. Furthermore, three different concentrations (10, 30, 50 mg) of plant fine powder were used for sandwich method test. There was a significant decline in the growth rate of experimental model radish seeds (P > 0.005), and results from sandwich method tests showed suppressed growth of root hairs, inhibiting the anchoring of the radish seed. In comparison, results manifest that; P. monspeliansis indicated an upsurge of inhibition (66.58% at 10,000 ppm), D. annulatum revealed soar germination (75.86% in controlled conditions), and C. ciliaris exhibited dramatic shoot up of inhibition because of sandwich method test (14.02% at 50 mg). In conclusion, although grasses are toxic, it is important to consider the beneficiary account.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsPlant ExtractsAnimalsHumansIntroduced SpeciesPhytochemicalsPoaceaeTanninsAlkaloidsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsTannins

Identifiers

PMID37202455
PMCPMC10195856
OpenAlexW4377093516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.