Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202368›Full record

SynthesisJournal of sleep research2023

Brain stimulation techniques as novel treatment options for insomnia: A systematic review.

Lukas B Krone, Kristoffer D Fehér, Tania Rivero, Ximena Omlin

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of sleep research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Novel psychotherapies for insomnia.Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lukas B KroneUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-7221
Kristoffer D FehérUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1205-7157
Tania RiveroMedical Library, University Library of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-8850
Ximena OmlinUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2508-9956
University of Bern · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203971/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia and recent advances in pharmacotherapy, many patients with insomnia do not sufficiently respond to available treatments. This systematic review aims to present the state of science regarding the use of brain stimulation approaches in treating insomnia. To this end, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO from inception to 24 March 2023. We evaluated studies that compared conditions of active stimulation with a control condition or group. Outcome measures included standardized insomnia questionnaires and/or polysomnography in adults with a clinical diagnosis of insomnia. Our search identified 17 controlled trials that met inclusion criteria, and assessed a total of 967 participants using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electric stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation or forehead cooling. No trials using other techniques such as deep brain stimulation, vestibular stimulation or auditory stimulation met the inclusion criteria. While several studies report improvements of subjective and objective sleep parameters for different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electric stimulation protocols, important methodological limitations and risk of bias limit their interpretability. A forehead cooling study found no significant group differences in the primary endpoints, but better sleep initiation in the active condition. Two transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation trials found no superiority of active stimulation for most outcome measures. Although modulating sleep through brain stimulation appears feasible, gaps in the prevailing models of sleep physiology and insomnia pathophysiology remain to be filled. Optimized stimulation protocols and proof of superiority over reliable sham conditions are indispensable before brain stimulation becomes a viable treatment option for insomnia.

Indexed as

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultBrainHumansPolysomnographySleepTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment Outcomebrain coolinginsomnia disorderinsomnia treatmenttranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationtranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37202368
PMCPMC10909439
OpenAlexW4377012332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.