Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37202126›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Minimal important change and difference for knee osteoarthritis outcome measurement tools after non-surgical interventions: a systematic review.

M Denika C Silva, Diana M Perriman, Angela M Fearon, Jacqui M Couldrick, Jennie M Scarvell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03460236 (Precision Assessment of Platelet Rich Plasma for Joint Preservation), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03460236 completednot on this map

Precision Assessment of Platelet Rich Plasma for Joint Preservation

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2018 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsOsteoarthritis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Laboratory-selected, probioticFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M Denika C SilvaFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia denika.silva@canberra.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8648-471X
Diana M PerrimanFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Angela M FearonFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-3074
Jacqui M CouldrickFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Jennie M ScarvellFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
University of Canberra · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically review and provide estimates of the minimal important change (MIC) and difference (MID) for outcome tools in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) after non-surgical interventions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched up to 21 September 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that calculated MIC and MID using any calculation method including anchor, consensus and distribution methods, for any knee OA outcome tool after non-surgical interventions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted reported MIC, MID and minimum detectable change (MDC) estimates. We used quality assessment tools appropriate to the studies' methods to screen out low-quality studies. Values were combined to produce a median and range, for each method.

resultsForty-eight studies were eligible (anchor-k=12, consensus-k=1 and distribution-k=35). MIC values for 13 outcome tools including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain, activities of daily living (ADL), quality of life (QOL) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)-function were estimated using 5 high-quality anchor studies. MID values for 23 tools including KOOS-pain, ADL, QOL and WOMAC-function, stiffness and total were estimated using 6 high-quality anchor studies. One moderate quality consensus study reported MIC for pain, function and global assessment. MDC values from distribution method estimates for 126 tools including KOOS-QOL and WOMAC-total were estimated using 38 good-to-fair-quality studies.

conclusionMedian MIC, MID and MDC estimates were reported for outcome tools in people with knee OA after non-surgical interventions. The results of this review clarify the current understanding of MIC, MID and MDC in the knee OA population. However, some estimates suggest considerable heterogeneity and require careful interpretation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020215952.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeActivities of Daily LivingHumansOntarioPainQuality of LifeKneeMusculoskeletal disordersSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID37202126
PMCPMC10201231
OpenAlexW4377094813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.