Trial reportBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
Efficacy of modified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound Guided M-Tapa Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Underwent Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery
The Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Plane Blocks on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Recovery in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Thoracoabdominal nerves block through the perichondrial approach: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of TAP and M-TAPA Blocks in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided modified thoracoabdominal nerve block in paediatric upper abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- A Comparison of Two Fascial Plane Blocks for Abdominal Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery (M-TAPA vs. External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block): A Prospective Randomized Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Bilateral Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondrial Approach in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach for surgical patients: a scoping review.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Comparison of Quality of Recovery between Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerves Block through Perichondrial Approach versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Modified-Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondral Approach in a Patient Undergoing Bilateral Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Report.Local and regional anesthesia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModified thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach is a novel fascial plane block and provides abdominal analgesia by blocking thoracoabdominal nerves. Our primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of M-TAPA on quality of recovery and pain scores in patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery (Trans Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal approach ‒ TAPP).
methodsPatients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II aged between 18 and 65 years scheduled for elective TAPP under general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. After intubation, the patients were randomized into two groups: M: M-TAPA group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 30). M-TAPA was performed with total 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine in the M group. Surgical infiltration was performed in the control group. The primary outcome of the study was the global quality of recovery score, the secondary outcomes were pain scores, rescue analgesic demands, and adverse effects during the 24-h postoperative period.
resultsThe global quality of recovery scores at 24 h were significantly higher in the M group (p < 0.001). There was a reduction in the median static and dynamic NRS for the first postoperative 8 h in the M group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The need for rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the M group compared to the control group (13 patients vs. 24 respectively, p < 0.001). The incidence of side effects was significantly higher in the control group (p < 0.001).
conclusionIn our study, M-TAPA increased patient recovery scores, and provided pain relief in patients who underwent TAPP. REGISTER NUMBER: NCT05199922.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.