Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37201216›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research. Neuroimaging2023

Multi-study evaluation of neuroimaging-based prediction of medication class in mood disorders.

Mustafa S Salman, Eric Verner, H Jeremy Bockholt, Zening Fu, Maria Misiura, Bradley T Baker, Elizabeth Osuch, Jing Sui, Vince D Calhoun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mustafa S SalmanTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA; School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: esalman@gatech.edu.
Eric VernerTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.
H Jeremy BockholtTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zening FuTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maria MisiuraTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bradley T BakerTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elizabeth OsuchLawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Centre, FEMAP, London, Ontario, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jing SuiTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA; Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Vince D CalhounTri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA; School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Data-driven approaches to identify biomarkers from multimodal imaging big dataR01MH117107 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Generalizing and Standardizing fMRI Tools for Differentiating Mental Illnesses and Predicting Medication-Class Response in PatientsR41MH122201 · NIMH · ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS GROUP · PI BOCKHOLT, HENRY JEREMY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2020 to 2021
$889k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117107NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695NIMH NIH HHS R41 MH122201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians often face a dilemma in diagnosing bipolar disorder patients with complex symptoms who spend more time in a depressive state than a manic state. The current gold standard for such diagnosis, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), is not objectively grounded in pathophysiology. In such complex cases, relying solely on the DSM may result in misdiagnosis as major depressive disorder (MDD). A biologically-based classification algorithm that can accurately predict treatment response may help patients suffering from mood disorders. Here we used an algorithm to do so using neuroimaging data. We used the neuromark framework to learn a kernel function for support vector machine (SVM) on multiple feature subspaces. The neuromark framework achieves up to 95.45% accuracy, 0.90 sensitivity, and 0.92 specificity in predicting antidepressant (AD) vs. mood stabilizer (MS) response in patients. We incorporated two additional datasets to evaluate the generalizability of our approach. The trained algorithm achieved up to 89% accuracy, 0.88 sensitivity, and 0.89 specificity in predicting the DSM-based diagnosis on these datasets. We also translated the model to distinguish responders to treatment from nonresponders with up to 70% accuracy. This approach reveals multiple salient biomarkers of medication-class of response within mood disorders.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderMajor Depressive DisorderHumansMood DisordersNeuroimagingAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar disorderKernel SVMMajor depressive disorderNeuromarkTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID37201216
PMCPMC10330565
OpenAlexW4375945060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.