ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2023
Brief and Ultra-Brief Suicide-Specific Interventions.
Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07655986 (Impact of a High-resolution Program for the Prevention of Suicidal Behavior in At-risk Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of a High-resolution Program for the Prevention of Suicidal Behavior in At-risk Adults: a Quasi-experimental Ambispective Cohort Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency and correlates of suicidality in a sample of traumatized treatment-seeking refugees.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Risk of unnatural death following self-harm in South Africa: development and validation of multivariable prognostic models.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Targeting Psychological Pain After a Suicide Attempt: Scoping Review and Intervention Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of brief interventions and contacts after suicide attempt: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Incidence and prognostic factors of self-harm and subsequent unnatural death in South Africa: A cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- BRAVA: A randomized controlled trial of a brief group intervention for youth with suicidal ideation and their caregivers.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Are Suicide-Specific Interventions Required to Reduce Suicidal Ideation? An Empirical Examination in a Clinical Sample of Eating Disorder Participants.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Beyond risk: rethinking hospitalization for suicidal individuals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Evidence-Based Youth Suicide Prevention and Intervention in Pediatric Primary Care Settings.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising rates of suicide warrant effective treatments that can quickly help stabilize suicidal individuals and prevent future suicidal crises from occurring. Across the past few decades, there has been a rise in the development of ultra-brief (1-4 sessions) and brief suicide-specific interventions (6-12 sessions) to meet this need. This article reviews several prominent ultra-brief and brief interventions, including the Teachable Moment Brief Intervention, Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program, Safety Planning Intervention, Crisis Response Planning, Cognitive Therapy for Suicide Prevention, Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention, Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality, and the Coping Long-Term With Active Suicide Program. A brief review of each interventions' evidence base is also provided. Current challenges and directions for future research in testing the efficacy and effectiveness of suicide prevention initiatives are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.