Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37201135›Full record

ArticleSurvey research methods2021

Assessing consent for and response to health survey components in an era of falling response rates: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2018.

Geraldine McQuillan, Deanna Kruszon-Moran, Hua Di, Denise Schaar, Susan Lukacs, Tala Fakhouri, Ryne Paulose-Ram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Survey research methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geraldine McQuillanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.
Deanna Kruszon-MoranCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.
Hua DiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.
Denise SchaarCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.
Susan LukacsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.
Tala FakhouriCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.
Ryne Paulose-RamCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, U.S.A.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response rates for national population-based surveys have declined, including the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Declining response to the initial NHANES interview may impact consent and participation in downstream survey components such as record linkage, physical exams, storage of biological samples and phlebotomy. Interview response rates dropped from 68% in 2011-2012 to 53% in 2017-2018 for adults age 18 and older. Response was higher for children (1-17 years) but with a similar downward trend (2011-2012, 81%; 2017-2018, 65%). Despite declining interview response rates, changes in consent and response rates for downstream components over time have been mixed. Among those interviewed, the examination response rate was over 93%, consent for record linkage was over 90%, and consent for storage of specimens for future research was over 99%. The availability of a blood sample for storage ranged between 60%-65% for children and 78%-85% for adults.

Indexed as

BiorepositoriesInformed consentLinkageResponse RateSurvey

Identifiers

PMID37201135
PMCPMC10191170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.