Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37201097›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

A narrative review of intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in gastrointestinal cancer: situation and future directions.

Han Li, Xiaozhou Xie, Fengying Du, Xingyu Zhu, Huicheng Ren, Chunshui Ye, Zhaodong Liu, Yulong Zhao, Xinshuai Yu, Chi Zhang and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Safety of indocyanine green use in bariatric and metabolic surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Han Li *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Xiaozhou Xie *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Fengying DuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Xingyu ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Huicheng RenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Chunshui YeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Zhaodong LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Yulong ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Xinshuai YuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Chi ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Liang ShangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Leping LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Provincial Laboratory of Translational Medicine Engineering for Digestive Tumors, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: As a surgical tool, indocyanine green (ICG) is increasingly used in surgery, especially in gastric and colorectal surgery. The use of ICG fluorescence imaging can improve the accuracy of tumor resection and potentially improve surgical outcomes for cancer patients. However, there are still different opinions or controversies on the application of ICG in the literature and the administration of ICG is still not uniform. In this review, we summarize the current status of its application and ICG administration methods in gastrointestinal cancer and discuss its existing limitations and future research directions. Methods: Literature published in the PubMed database from 1969 to 2022 was searched for using the keywords "Indocyanine green or near-infrared imaging or ICG", "gastric cancer", "gastroesophageal junction cancer", and "colorectal cancer" to summarize the main applications of ICG in gastrointestinal cancers. Key Content and Findings: ICG guidance can rapidly determine tumor location and save operative time, and can also visualize lymph nodes (LNs) in real-time, helping surgeons to retrieve more LNs for better postoperative staging, but its use in identifying sentinel lymph node (SLN) in gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial due to false negatives. ICG fluorescent angiography has great potential in preventing colorectal anastomotic leakage, but there is a dearth of high-caliber research evidence. In addition, ICG has unique advantages in detecting colorectal liver micrometastasis. Notably, there is still no uniform administration method and dose of ICG. Conclusions: In this review, we summarize the current status of ICG application in gastrointestinal cancer, and the current literature suggests that it is safe and effective and has the potential to change the clinical outcome of patients. Therefore, ICG should be routinely used in gastrointestinal cancers to improve the surgical outcomes of patients. In addition, this review summarizes the ICG administration in the literature, and we expect future guidelines to unitize and standardize the administration of ICG.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer (CRC)gastric cancer (GC)gastrointestinal cancerIndocyanine green (ICG)liver metastasis

Identifiers

PMID37201097
PMCPMC10186510
OpenAlexW4367163271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.