Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37201095›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

Advances in pre-treatment evaluation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.

Michele Fiore, Alessandro Coppola, Gian Marco Petrianni, Pasquale Trecca, Gabriele D'Ercole, Paola Cimini, Edy Ippolito, Damiano Caputo, Bruno Beomonte Zobel, Roberto Coppola and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pan-cancer characterization ofTranslational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Repeatability of semi-quantitative [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michele FioreResearch Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro CoppolaDipartimento di Chirurgia, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Gian Marco PetrianniOperative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Pasquale TreccaOperative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele D'ErcoleResearch Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Paola CiminiOperative Research Unit of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Edy IppolitoResearch Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Damiano CaputoDepartment of Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Bruno Beomonte ZobelOperative Research Unit of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Roberto CoppolaDepartment of Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Sara RamellaResearch Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Campus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Despite advances in the multidisciplinary management of pancreatic cancer, overall prognosis remains poor, due to early progression of the disease. There is a need to also take action in staging, to make it increasingly accurate and complete, to define the setting of the therapeutic strategy. This review was planned to update the current status of pre-treatment evaluation for pancreatic cancer. Methods: We conducted an extensive review, including relevant articles dealing with traditional imaging, functional imaging and minimally invasive surgical procedures before treatment for pancreatic cancer. We searched articles written in English only. Data in the PubMed database, published in the period between January 2000 and January 2022, were retrieved. Prospective observational studies, retrospective analyses and meta-analyses were reviewed and analysed. Key Content and Findings: Each imaging modality (endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, staging laparoscopy) has its own diagnostic advantages and limitations. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each image set are reported. Data that support the increasing role of neoadjuvant therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and the meaning of a patient-tailored treatment selection, based on tumour staging, are also discussed. Conclusions: A multimodal pre-treatment workup should be searched as it improves staging accuracy, orienting patients with resectable tumors towards surgery, optimizing patient selection with locally advanced tumors to neoadjuvant or definite therapy and avoiding surgical resection or curative radiotherapy in those with metastatic disease.

Indexed as

imaginglaparoscopyPancreatic cancerstaging

Identifiers

PMID37201095
PMCPMC10186502
OpenAlexW4361804423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.