ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
Suspicious findings observed retrospectively on CT imaging performed before the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Appearance of Pancreas Predictive of Cancer Presence: Utility of Computed Tomography Volumetry.Cancers · 2026Article
- Pancreatic liposarcoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Automatic detection of main pancreatic duct dilation and pancreatic parenchymal atrophy based on a shape feature in abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Association of pancreatic atrophy patterns with intraductal extension of early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Early detection of pancreatic cancer in the era of precision medicine.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Temporal progression of pancreatic cancer computed tomography findings until diagnosis: A large-scale multicenter study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few studies have focused on computed tomography findings before a pancreatic cancer diagnosis. We aimed to investigate the prediagnostic computed tomography findings of patients who had undergone computed tomography within the prediagnostic period of their pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2019, 27 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal or chest computed tomography including the pancreas within 1 year of a pancreatic cancer diagnosis were enrolled in this retrospective study. The prediagnostic computed tomography imaging findings were divided into pancreatic parenchyma and pancreatic duct findings. Results: All patients underwent computed tomography for reasons unrelated to pancreatic cancer. The pancreatic parenchyma and ducts showed normal findings in seven patients and abnormal findings in 20 patients. Hypoattenuating mass-like lesions were detected in nine patients with a median size of 1.2 cm. Six patients had focal pancreatic duct dilatations, and two patients had distal parenchymal atrophy. In three patients, two of these findings were found simultaneously. Taken together, 14 (51.9%) of 27 patients had findings suggestive of pancreatic cancer in prediagnostic computed tomography. Conclusions: In contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed for other purposes, attention should be paid to the presence of a hypoattenuating mass, focal pancreatic duct dilatation, or distal parenchymal atrophy of the pancreas. These features may be clues for an early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.