Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37201061›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023

A case series of 10 patients undergone linear cutter/stapler guiding device-led overlapped esophagojejunostomy: a preliminary study.

Zetian Chen, Dong Wang, Qun Zhao, Peigang Yang, Pingan Ding, Hailiang Fan, Tianxiang Dong, Zijing Liu, Xin Yang, Lei Ren and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zetian ChenThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Dong WangThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qun ZhaoThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Peigang YangThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Pingan DingThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hailiang FanThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Tianxiang DongThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zijing LiuThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xin YangThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Lei RenThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yong LiThird Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hebei Medical University · CNFourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In laparoscopic total gastrectomy with overlap esophagojejunostomy (EJS), esophageal 'false track' is easily formed during EJS. In this study, a linear cutter/stapler guiding device (LCSGD) was used in EJS, so that the linear cutting stapler can complete the technical action with high speed and high efficiency in a narrow space, while avoiding the formation of 'false passage', optimizing the quality of common opening and shortening the anastomosis time. The LCSGD is safe and feasible in laparoscopic total gastrectomy overlap EJS, and the clinical effect is satisfactory. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive design was adopted. The clinical data of 10 gastric cancer patients admitted to the Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from July 2021 to November 2021 were collected. The cohort comprised 8 males and 2 females aged 50-75 years. Results: (I) The intra-operative conditions: 10 patients received LCSGD-guided overlap EJS after radical laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Both D2 lymphadenectomy and R0 resection were achieved in these patients. No combined multiple organ resection was performed. There was neither conversion to an open thoracic or abdominal procedure nor conversion to other EJS approaches. The average time from the entry of the LCSGD into the abdominal cavity to the completion of the firing of the stapler was 1.8±0.4 minutes, the average time for manual suturing of the EJS common opening was 14.4±2.1 minutes (mean: 18±2 stitches), and the average operative time was 255±52 minutes. (II) The postoperative outcomes: the time to the first ambulation was 1.9±1.4 days, the average time to the first postoperative exhaust/defecation was 3.5±1.3 days, the average time to a semi-liquid diet was 3.6±0.7 days, and the average postoperative hospital stay was 10.4±4.1 days. All patients were smoothly discharged, without any secondary surgery, bleeding, anastomotic fistula, or duodenal stump fistula. (III) Follow-up: The telephone follow-up lasted 9-12 months. No eating disorders or anastomotic stenosis was reported. One patient experienced Visick grade II heartburn, and the condition of the remaining 9 patients was Visick grade I. Conclusions: Application of the LCSGD in overlap EJS after laparoscopic total gastrectomy is safe and feasible, with satisfactory clinical effectiveness.

Indexed as

Gastric tumorlaparoscopic total gastrectomylinear cutter/stapler guiding device (LCSGD)overlap esophagojejunostomy (EJS)

Identifiers

PMID37201061
PMCPMC10186509
OpenAlexW4367856976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.