ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
Peptidomic changes in human serous colorectal cancer patients.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional Quality Fingerprinting of Wild and FarmedBiology · 2025Article
- Clinical Peptidomics in Acute Leukemias: Current Advances and Future Perspectives.Journal of proteome research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Peptidomics, considered a novel branch of proteomics, has an increasing range of applications in the screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and even monitoring of cancer. However, there is little information for peptidomics analysis in CRC. Methods: In this study, a comparative peptidomic profiling was analyzed in 3 CRC tissue samples and 3 adjacent intestinal epithelial tissue samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Results: Among the total 133 nonredundant peptides identified, 59 were significantly differentially expressed in the CRC samples and benign colonic epithelium conditions [fold change (FC) >2, P<0.05]. Totals of 25 up-regulated and 34 down-regulated peptides were detected, respectively. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were applied to predict the possible functions of these relevant precursor proteins. To clearly identify the potential interaction network of peptide precursors, the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) was used to determine protein interactions and a possible central role in CRC. Conclusions: Our results for the first time revealed the differentially expressed peptides between the serous CRC tissue and the adjacent intestinal epithelial tissue samples, and these prominently variable peptides might have an important potential role in occurrence and development of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.