ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2023
Risk factors for sepsis in patients with colorectal cancer complicated with gastrointestinal perforation and its impact on prognosis.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Predictive Value of Clinical and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Emergency Colic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Self-expanding metal stent as a bridge to elective surgery versus immediate emergency surgery in left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparative study.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Chemotherapy on the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in the Gut Microbiota of Colorectal Cancer Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics Analysis Reveals Microrchidia Family Genes as the Prognostic and Therapeutic Markers for Colorectal Cancer.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025Article
- A Narrative Literature Review on Sepsis: A Primary Manifestation of Colorectal Neoplasm.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal tumor. Gastrointestinal perforation is a common complication of colorectal cancer, resulting in peritonitis, abdominal abscess, and sepsis, and can eventually lead to death. The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors for sepsis in patients with colorectal cancer complicated with gastrointestinal perforation and its impact on prognosis. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2017, 126 patients with colorectal cancer complicated with gastrointestinal perforation admitted to the Dazu Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively and continuously collected. The patients were divided into a sepsis group (n=56) and a control group (n=70) according to whether they developed sepsis or not. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the risk factors of sepsis in patients with colorectal cancer complicated with gastrointestinal perforation. Finally, the impact of sepsis on the prognosis of patients was analyzed. Results: The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that anemia, intestinal obstruction, preoperative chemotherapy, acidosis, and albumin <30 g/L were independent risk factors for sepsis in colorectal cancer patients complicated with gastrointestinal perforation (P<0.05). Albumin was valuable in predicting the absence of sepsis in colorectal cancer patients complicated with gastrointestinal perforation, and the area under the curve was 0.751 (95% confidence interval: 0.666-0.835). R4.0.3 statistical software was used to randomly divide the dataset into training and validation sets, with a sample size of 88 in the training set and 38 in the validation set. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the training and validation sets were 0.857 (95% confidence interval: 0.776-0.938) and 0.735 (95% confidence interval: 0.568-0.902), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test was performed in the validation set; the chi-square value was 10.274 and the P value was 0.246, which indicated that the model had good confidence in predicting sepsis. Conclusions: Patients with colorectal cancer complicated by gastrointestinal perforation have a high incidence of sepsis, which can lead to a poor prognosis. The model presented in this study can effectively identify patients with a high risk of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.